What is the best resolution when security standards conflict with business objectives?

When security standards conflict with business objectives, performing a risk analysis is the best resolution because it allows an organization to assess the potential risks and impacts associated with both the security standards and the business objectives. Through a thorough risk analysis, management can evaluate the likelihood and consequences of various scenarios, enabling informed decision-making.

This process involves identifying the specific conflicting elements, analyzing the implications of adhering strictly to security standards versus adjusting business objectives, and considering how these factors align with the organization's overall risk appetite. A risk analysis will provide valuable insights into which areas can be flexible and which are critical for security compliance, ultimately guiding the organization towards a balanced solution that supports both security and business goals.

Changing the security standard or business objective may not consider the broader context or the potential risks involved, leading to unintended consequences. Authorizing a risk acceptance is a viable option but should be viewed as a result of the risk analysis rather than the initial step. The analysis equips decision-makers with the information needed to determine if accepting a risk is appropriate or if adjustments need to be made in one area to meet the requirements of the other.